At first glance, Thelema and Satanism might appear to walk parallel paths. Both challenge conventional morality, encourage personal liberation, and celebrate individual will. Embracing dark aesthetics, ritual magick, and the rejection of mainstream religious norms often blur the lines between them in the public imagination. But beneath the surface, these two systems of thought diverge profoundly metaphysically, theologically, and philosophically.
The core distinction begins with Thelema’s transcendent vision. Rooted in the received text Liber AL vel Legis, Thelema proclaims a new Aeon governed by the Law of Thelema: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.1 This is not a license for hedonism or egoism. It is a divine directive to discover and enact one’s True Will, the unique, inborn purpose of the soul, which exists within a sacred cosmic order.2 Thelema calls its practitioners to unite with Nuit (the infinite expanse), realize themselves as Hadit (the point of awareness), and express the Solar energy of Ra-Hoor-Khuit through conscious action.3
Satanism, by contrast, often positions itself in rebellion. Particularly in LaVeyan Satanism and similar currents, the focus is on atheistic individualism, carnal self-expression, and mocking the moral systems of Christianity.4 While that reaction may be empowering for those escaping religious oppression, it remains reactionary. Thelema, on the other hand, is revelatory. It does not rebel against Christianity; it transcends it entirely. In Thelemic cosmology, concepts like “God” and “Devil” are seen as artifacts of a bygone Aeon. Satan is not some great evil; he is irrelevant.5
Attempting to conflate Thelema with Satanism also introduces a fatal confusion about the nature of “will.” Satanism often encourages the gratification of personal desires. In contrast, Thelema demands alignment with True Will, one that may require sacrifice, discipline, and surrender of ego.6 Thelema is not about doing what you want; it is about doing what you must.
Moreover, Thelema’s magical and mystical framework depends on a deeply esoteric cosmology that includes the Tree of Life, the Aeons, initiatory grades, and the purification of the soul. It aims at union with the divine through spiritual alchemy.7 Most forms of Satanism, especially secular ones, reject transcendence outright. This results in a fundamental incompatibility: Thelema reaches for the stars; Satanism chooses to stay grounded in the self.
Aleister Crowley, Thelema’s prophet, occasionally used Satanic imagery for dramatic or symbolic effect. But he consistently rejected Satanism as a serious path. In Liber ABA, he wrote that identifying with Satan is “an error”, a sign that one is still trapped in the dualistic thinking of the old Aeon.
Aleister Crowley, Thelema’s prophet, occasionally used Satanic imagery for dramatic or symbolic effect. But he consistently rejected Satanism as a serious path. In Liber ABA, he wrote that identifying with Satan is an error, a sign that one is still trapped in the dualistic thinking of the old Aeon.8
In short, Thelema and Satanism operate on different spiritual frequencies entirely. To conflate them is to misunderstand both. Thelema is not a religion of rebellion; it is a religion of stars, of divine purpose, and of the radiant Will that transcends all bondage, even that of reaction itself.
Footnotes
-
Aleister Crowley, Libri of Aleister Crowley: Liber AL vel Legis (The Book of the Law), I:40.
This foundational line expresses the essence of Thelemic doctrine.↩︎ -
Israel Regardie, The Tree of Life (Llewellyn Publications, 2008), pp. 12–15.
Discusses True Will as a metaphysical and initiatory concept, not egoic desire.↩︎ -
Aleister Crowley, The Law is for All (New Falcon Publications, 1996), pp. 84–88.
Nuit and Hadit are symbolic of divine polarity and consciousness.↩︎ -
Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Bible (Avon Books, 1969), pp. 25–30.
Lays out Satanism’s materialist and individualist ethos.↩︎ -
Hymenaeus Beta (ed.), Magick: Book 4 (Weiser, 1997), p. 142.
Crowley interprets dualism as a spiritual error of the past Aeon.↩︎ -
Rodney Orpheus, Abrahadabra: Understanding Aleister Crowley’s Thelemic Magick (Weiser Books, 2005), pp. 61–62.
True Will is described as a divine imperative beyond ego.↩︎ -
Dion Fortune, The Mystical Qabalah (Weiser Books, 2000), pp. 76–79.
Details the initiatory Qabalistic framework inherited by Thelema.↩︎ -
Aleister Crowley, Magick: Liber ABA, Book 4, Part III, “Magick in Theory and Practice”.
Crowley explains that “‘The Devil’ SATAN or HADIT … is not the enemy of Man, but He who made Gods of our race, knowing Good and Evil; He bade ‘Know Thyself!’ and taught Initiation,” reframing Satanic imagery as symbolic rather than adversarial artifact of the old Aeon.↩︎
